Patients who choose to continue to use the drug must review statements describing the cardiovascular safety concerns associated with Avandia and acknowledge they understand the risks. Their doctors must also attest to and document their patients’ eligibility.

The new rule applies to all drugs containing rosiglitazone, including Avandia , Avandamet (rosiglitazone and metformin) and Avandaryl (rosiglitazone and glimeperide).  GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Avandia, says it will inform pharmacists and doctors about the new program over the next two months. Patients are advised to discuss their diabetes treatment options with their doctors.

More than 23 million Americans are believed to have type 2 diabetes, and nearly 500,000 Americans filled prescriptions for rosiglitazone in the first 10 months of 2010. At that point, prescriptions dropped considerably as news of the restrictions due to health risk were announced.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › FDA to remove Avandia from retail pharmacies

A black box warning, or boxed warning, is the strongest warning the FDA can issue and is given to prescription drugs that may cause serious or life threatening health consequences. The boxed warning section describes the risk for congestive heart failure and myocardial infraction, or heart attack, as statistically significant based on clinical trials.

Also added to the warnings and precautions section of the safety information for rosiglitazone are warnings for cardiac failure, adverse cardiovascular events, and fractures. The adverse reactions section was also updated to include a possible increased risk for heart attack when Avandia is used in combination with insulin.

Last fall, the FDA voted to put tight restrictions on Avandia and other drugs in its class based on data from clinical trials that showed use of the drug put patients at risk for cardiovascular events such as heart attacks and strokes. The FDA also ordered makers of the drug to update the product’s safety label to include the warnings. Since the FDA’s ruling, in order for Americans to continue to receive the drug, their doctors must attest to and document their patients’ eligibility. Patients will also have to review statements describing the cardiovascular safety concerns associated with Avandia and acknowledge they understand the risks.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › FDA approves new warnings on Avandia packaging

GSK was facing about 2,000 lawsuits alleging it covered up Avandia’s heart attack and stroke risks. The company previously agreed to pay about $460 million to resolve allegations it didn’t properly warn doctors and consumers about the medicine’s risk. That news brought more lawsuits against the GSK, and more settlements to the forefront.

The drug was pulled from the European market and severely restricted in the United States last September, after studies linked Avandia to an increased risk for cardiovascular events. This week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved label changes for Avandia and outlined the standards that patients must meet before they can take the drug.

Those guidelines state that the drug should only be used in patients already being treated with rosiglitazone, in patients whose blood sugar cannot be controlled with other anti-diabetic medications, and who, after consulting with their health care professional, do not wish to use pioglitazone-containing medications, another type of diabetes drug that includes the brands Actos, Actoplus Met, Actoplus Met XR, or Duetact.

Avandia is a single-ingredient product and is also sold as a combination product under the brand name Avandament (with metformin) and the brand name Avandaryl (with glimepride).

Studies suggest as many as 100,000 heart attacks may have been caused by the drug.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › GSK pays out more money to settle lawsuits against deadly diabetes drug

The lixisenatide study sought to establish the efficacy and safety of using both lixisenatide and Lantus together. The clinical trials involving 311 patients in Asia with Type 2 diabetes showed those who had a difficult time keeping their blood sugar levels within safe limits with basal insulin alone, were helped by the addition of a daily lixisenatide injection. At least 60 percent of the patients took Lantus as their basal insulin.

Lixisenatide belongs to a class of drugs that work by imitating a hormone called GLP-1 to stimulate the pancreas to produce more insulin after meals. By the time the drug is expected to be approved, its main purpose will be in combination with Lantus.

Lixisenatide could offer more options to Type 2 diabetics, who last month were informed that prescriptions of the diabetes drug Avandia would be severely restricted after a review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found the drug to increase the risk of cardiovascular events. Clinical trials showed lixisenatide to be generally well tolerated with no significant adverse events.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Experimental diabetes drug performs well in clinical trials

In order for Americans to continue to receive the drug, their doctors must attest to and document their patients’ eligibility. Patients will also have to review statements describing the cardiovascular safety concerns associated with Avandia and acknowledge they understand the risks. The FDA says it anticipates the tight restrictions will likely have a devastating impact on GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) Avandia, the sales of which topped $2 billion last year, down from $3.2 billion in 2006.

Avandia, known by the generic rosiglitazone, is in a class of drugs known as thiazolidinediones, or TZDs. It is intended to be used in conjunction with diet and exercise to improve blood sugar control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Rosiglitazone is also available in combination with other diabetes medications, such as metformin under the brand name Avandament or glimepiride under the name Avandaryl.

Despite studies that suggest as many as 100,000 heart attacks may have been caused by Avandia, GSK has long insisted that its billion-dollar drug is safe, going so far as to hold its own study comparing Avandia with a similar medication, Actos. The FDA has ordered GSK to end the study.

The FDA also ordered GSK to convene an independent group of scientists to review key aspects of the company’s clinical trial known as RECORD, which studied the cardiovascular safety of Avandia compared to standard diabetes drugs. During a review of the data, the FDA questioned GSK’s potential bias in the identification of cardiovascular events.

The FDA is continuing to review complaints on the medication. Any side effects with Avandia, or any other medication, should be reported to the FDA Medwatch Adverse Event Reporting Program at www.FDA.gov/Medwatch.

Sources:
New York Times
FDA

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › FDA puts tight restrictions on Avandia due to heart attack, stroke risk

But don’t expect physicians to write as many prescriptions for the Type 2 diabetes drug as they have in the past. Avandia brought in $1 billion in sales last year with more than 2 million prescriptions filled. But studies showing heart attacks, strokes and cardiovascular-related deaths in people who used Avandia have prompted national experts in a Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association to unanimously advise that GlaxoSmithKline’s blockbuster medication not be used.

While Avandia will still be available, the FDA vote showed a strong majority – 21 out of 33 members – believe Avandia increases heart risk. Twelve out of 33 members voted to take it off the market, and 10 out of 33 voted to leave it on with strong restrictions.

And while the FDA advisory panel heard damning evidence on the safety of Avandia, it was reported that GSK had agreed to settle some 10,000 of the 13,000 lawsuits filed against it alleging that Avandia caused heart attacks or strokes.

What diabetics should glean from the vote is that they need to be aware that there is a dark cloud of suspicion hanging over the safety of Avandia, which should be enough evidence for them to consider the many safer alternatives on the market.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Dark cloud hangs over Avandia despite FDA vote to keep it on market

Avandia was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999 to treat Type 2 diabetes, the fastest growing form of diabetes. GSK launched a multimillion-dollar ad campaign to introduce the drug to the market, which brought in $1 billion in sales last year alone with more than 2 million prescriptions filled.

A 2007 study found that Avandia could increase the risk of heart attack by as much as 43 percent, and more recent studies suggest that Avandia may be responsible for thousands of cardiovascular events such as heart attacks, strokes and other heart problems. In 2007, an FDA panel reviewed the data but voted not to pull the drug off the market.

However, concerns over a new study on the drug has led the FDA to conduct a second review the safety of Avandia. The agency is also questioning whether GSK tried to cover up the risks associated with the drug.

The panel is expected to vote soon on whether to remove the popular diabetes drug from the market.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › GSK to pay $460 million to settle Avandia lawsuits

According to the FDA’s announcement, the “FDA previously communicated to the public about the possible association between rosiglitazone and increased cardiovascular risk in a 2007 safety alert. The agency also sought advice from external experts at the July 30, 2007, joint meeting of the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees. The RECORD study data represent the only new information from a completed randomized, controlled clinical trial of rosiglitazone received by FDA since the 2007 announcements.”

The RECORD study, which stands for Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes, was designed to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of rosiglitazone. This practice is consistent with the FDA’s December 2008 Guidance for Industry that recommends that manufacturers of new treatments for diabetes carefully design their clinical trials to include an evaluation of cardiovascular safety.

Once the FDA has completed its review of rosiglitazone, the agency will present its findings at a joint public meeting of the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees in July 2010.

Rosiglitazone, a treatment for Type 2 diabetes, is sold as a single-ingredient product under the brand name Avandia, and is available in combination with other diabetes medications, such as metformin, under the brand name Avandament, or glimepride, under the brand name Avandaryl. The FDA advises that patients who are currently taking any form of rosiglitazone should not stop taking their medication without first talking to their healthcare professional. Any side effects with this or any other medication should be reported to the FDA MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program at www.fda.gov/medwatch.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › FDA announces it will review studies linking Avandia to heart attacks

The maker of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), disputes the osteoporosis finding. The company said in a statement today that their ADOPT studies showed no increase in spine or hip fractures which are associated with osteoporosis.

The company says they will be looking further into the subject.There are other possibly safer alternative treatments for diabetes, according to Paul Brandt, an associate professor of neuroscience and experimental therapeutics at Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine. “Anyone who is already at risk for osteoporotic fractures should consider an alternative anti-diabetic drug.”

Amanda Gardner of HealthDay News reports that Avandia affects a key cellular protein called the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-gamma). The mice studies by the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla California found that activating this receptor stimulates the production of osteoclasts. These osteoclasts degrade bone.

Avandia recently received some bad press concerning the relation of the drug with heart problems. Avandia, along with four other drugs in the same class, were given blackbox warnings by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These warnings are the strictest advisories offered by the FDA for products that they have approved. The drug was linked to heart failure in some patients.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Type 2 diabetes drug Avandia linked to osteoporosis and bone loss

For four years, the study followed patients over age 65, who have the highest rate of type 2 diabetes but aren’t well represented in clinical trials, says lead author Lorraine Lipscombe, a Toronto endocrinologist and researcher at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science, funded by the Ontario government.

Lipscombe’s team looked at how patients fared on Avandia or Actos, the only two drugs in their class, compared with those on other diabetes pills.

Since August, the U.S. labels for Avandia and Actos have carried a “black box” warning against their use in patients with advanced congestive heart failure. But the new study found Avandia raised heart failure risk even in patients with no history of the condition, suggesting the heart failure warning doesn’t go far enough, Lipscome’s team writes in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

About 8 percent of patients went to a hospital for congestive heart failure or a heart attack during the study. Compared with patients on other diabetes pills, those on only Avandia or Actos had a 60 percent higher risk of congestive heart failure and a 40 percent higher heart attack risk. They also had a 29 percent higher risk of death.

For reasons not yet clear, the increased heart risks seen in the Avandia/Actos group were predominantly in those on Avandia. That doesn’t mean Actos is safer, Lipscombe says. Her study might have had too few Actos patients – half the number on Avandia – to detect a higher risk, she says.

In observational studies such as this, factors other than the drugs in question might skew results, so clinical trials that randomly assign patients to treatments are considered the gold standard.

“The problems with the study become obvious with regard to the CHF (congestive heart failure) findings,” Nancy Pekarek, spokeswoman for Avandia maker Glaxo-SmithKline, said in an e-mail. “We know (Avandia and Actos) have well-documented and similar CHF events, yet this study somehow finds an increase in these events with Avandia versus Actos.”

But Steven Nissen, the Cleveland Clinic’s chief of cardiovascular surgery, says Lipscombe’s study “has a lot of appeal. It’s independent, it’s not funded by industry, and it’s huge.” And, “it’s real-life data.”

Nissen reported in The New England Journal of Medicine in May the pooled results of 42 short-term clinical trials showed Avandia patients were 43 percent more likely to have a heart attack or be hospitalized for blocked coronary arteries than others in the trials.

Based on Nissen’s study and others, the Food and Drug Administration last month added information to Avandia’s black box about a potential increased heart attack risk. The FDA has asked Glaxo to compare Avandia’s heart attack risk with those of other diabetes pills. That clinical trial is not expected to be done until March 2014.

January 8th, 2008 by RITA RUBIN with APP.com

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia study shows increased heart risks or death

Grant started taking Avandia two years ago after he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Prior to taking Avandia, he had no history of heart problems. “Grant had never had any problems in the past,” Mark says. “He had a clean bill of health in terms of his heart prior to that. There was no history of heart disease in our family.”

Within a year of being on Avandia, Grant was diagnosed with high blood pressure. Within two years, Grant was diagnosed with 80 percent blockage of his arteries. He required a quadruple bypass surgery. Grant went in for the surgery on a Monday, but experienced some complications and came out of the surgery with a heart fibrillation.
Only three days after the surgery, Grant suffered a massive stroke, which left him paralyzed on his left side and unable to speak. “We don’t know what caused the stroke, but we assume it had something to do with his requiring the operation to begin with,” Mark says.

Furthermore, Grant’s kidneys shut down and he developed swelling on his brain. Luckily, after two days of dialysis, Grant’s kidneys began to function again and he regained his ability to speak three weeks later. However, damage to his brain was about 25 percent.

“The surgeon and the doctor controlling Grant’s diabetes were surprised he was there with blocked arteries, considering his health prior to this,” Mark says. “They couldn’t believe that a 45-year-old had the problems Grant had.”

Some people might think that Grant’s stroke and other problems were caused by complications from the surgery and that Avandia had nothing to do with it. However, would Grant have required the surgery if he had not been on Avandia? Even if Avandia did not directly cause the stroke, it may have been an indirect cause because it pushed Grant’s blood pressure up and started a chain of events that culminated in his stroke.

“Grant will probably never be 100 percent,” Mark says. “He had 25 percent of his brain affected by the stroke. He was an amazing musician, so that’s rough for him. He’s lost a lot of quality of life. Having said that, he’s got a sense of humor and he’s working hard.

“In Grant’s room, a room of eight people, there were four other patients that had open-heart surgery that had also been on Avandia. Something must be going on-some doctors must have an idea of what is going on.

“It’s starting to sound a lot like Vioxx, where statements are made that the risks outweigh the benefits.

“I just want some justice done here for my brother.”

December 22nd, 2007 by Heidi Turner with LawyersandSettlements.com

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia starting to sound a lot like Vioxx

For four years, the study followed patients over age 65, who have the highest rate of type 2 diabetes but aren’t well-represented in clinical trials, says lead author Lorraine Lipscombe, a Toronto endocrinologist and researcher at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science, funded by the Ontario government.

Lipscombe’s team looked at how patients fared on Avandia or Actos, the only two drugs in their class, compared with those on other diabetes pills.

Since August, the U.S. labels for Avandia and Actos have carried a “black box” warning against their use in patients with advanced congestive heart failure. However, the new study found Avandia raised heart failure risk even in patients with no history of the condition, suggesting the heart failure warning doesn’t go far enough, Lipscome’s team writes in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

About 8% of patients went to a hospital for congestive heart failure or a heart attack during the study. Compared with patients on other diabetes pills, those on only Avandia or Actos had a 60% higher risk of congestive heart failure and a 40% higher heart attack risk. They also had a 29% higher risk of death.

For reasons not yet clear, the increased heart risks seen in the Avandia/Actos group were predominantly in those on Avandia. That doesn’t mean Actos is safer, Lipscombe says. Her study might have had too few Actos patients – half the number on Avandia – to detect a higher risk, she says.

In observational studies such as this, factors other than the drugs in question might skew results, so clinical trials that randomly assign patients to treatments are considered the gold standard.

“The problems with the study become obvious with regard to the CHF (congestive heart failure) findings,” Nancy Pekarek, spokeswoman for Avandia maker Glaxo-SmithKline, said in an e-mail. “We know (Avandia and Actos) have well-documented and similar CHF events, yet this study somehow finds an increase in these events with Avandia vs. Actos.”

But Steven Nissen, the Cleveland Clinic’s chief of cardiovascular surgery, says Lipscombe’s study “has a lot of appeal. It’s independent, it’s not funded by industry, and it’s huge.” And, “it’s real-life data.”

Nissen reported in The New England Journal of Medicine in May the pooled results of 42 short-term clinical trials showed Avandia patients were 43% more likely to have a heart attack or be hospitalized for blocked coronary arteries than others in the trials.

Based on Nissen’s study and others, the Food and Drug Administration last month added information to Avandia’s black box about a potential increased heart attack risk. The FDA has asked Glaxo to compare Avandia’s heart attack risk with those of other diabetes pills. That clinical trial is not expected to be done until March 2014.

December 11th, 2007 by Rita Rubin USA TODAY with USA Today

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › New Avandia study reaffirms heart risk

Initially, it was thought that rosiglitazone, the generic term for the drug that is marketed as Avandia, was serving as a governor to the bone-building process. In other words, as bones evolve in the human body (much like skin), it was originally thought that Avandia somehow contributed towards an inability to effectively regenerate bone lost in the natural regenerative process.

However, this latest conclusion-arrived at quite by accident-reveals that rosiglitazone actually contributes to bones loss over long treatment periods. Rather then prevent bone from regenerating, Avandia contributes to actual bone loss.

The finding leads to “a better understanding of the challenges associated with long-term treatment of patients with Type II diabetes,” according to Ronald M. Evans of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., lead author of the report.

Researchers were conducting studies on diabetic mice, when they stumbled upon their surprising conclusion. Their findings offer hope that this aspect of Avandia as a contributor to bone loss could be further studied and isolated and, one day, ‘dialed-out’ of a future generation of drugs dedicated to the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.

The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the National Institutes of Health funded the research. The findings appeared in this week’s online issue of Nature Medicine.

Researchers found that rosiglitazone-Avandia-stimulates the cells that break down bone in the body, for future regeneration. Osteoporosis occurs when the body loses more bone that it has the capacity to regenerate. Osteoporosis is of particular concern to older women, and this latest research suggests that Avandia should not be prescribed to patients with a history of osteoporosis.

Further, for Avandia patients who also suffer from chronic osteoporosis, there is now the possibility of a contributing cause to the bone loss.

It may not just be from aging. Avandia may be helping it along.

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia now linked to Osteoporosis

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advised that GlaxoSmithKline, Avandia’s maker, agreed to add the new warning to the existing black box warning. But, despite the revision, the FDA will not withdraw Avandia from the market, claiming that evidence for increased heart attack is inconclusive and does not appear to be higher in Avandia than other type 2 diabetes treatments. In the meantime, the FDA asked GlaxoSmithKline to conduct a long-term study comparing Avandia with other type 2 diabetes drugs. The trial will likely commence in a year; however, full results will not be available until 2014. Patient advocates and FDA critics consider the black box warning a weak response to Avandia’s safety issues and have requested Avandia be pulled from the market.

Avandia breaks down the body’s resistance to insulin but has long been known to cause fluid retention, a major risk factor for congestive heart failure. Evidence does not indicate Avandia and other oral anti-diabetes drugs-thiazolidinediones-prevent cardiovascular risk as a result of reducing blood sugar.

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes released a revised consensus statement stating that emerging information suggests additional hazards associated with thiazolidedione and rosiglitazone (Avandia) and may result in increased risk of myocardial infarctions. In October, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced it was dropping Avandia from its prescription drug formulary stating their review concluded that, in some, Avandia did not afford the same margin of safety as other diabetes medications. The VA accounted for nearly 10-percent of Avandia’s US sales.

In November, Health Canada sent a letter to Canadian health professionals advising Avandia could no longer be prescribed as monotherapy for type 2 diabetes or in combination with sulfonylurea. In May, research based on 42 Avandia studies confirmed a 43-percent increased risk of heart attack among patients taking the drug. In August, Avandia’s warning label was changed to warn that Avandia and others in its class might worsen heart failure.

A Congressional Committee Report found that company executives made a concerted effort to intimidate a diabetes expert into keeping quiet about Avandia’s safety problems, alleging that Glaxo Chief Executive Jean-Pierre Garnier and former research chief Tachi Yamada were involved. An internal government memo dated July 16, 2002 analyzed 47 early FDA reports of patients who went into heart failure and required hospitalization while taking Avandia. The report contained warnings from Federal investigators that Avandia might cause heart failure.

Over six million Americans have used the drug to treat adult-onset, or type 2, diabetes and the concern about Avandia is nothing new. The association between Avandia and increased heart failure risk has been known since 1999 when the drug was first approved.

Avandia was Glaxo’s second most popular drug in 2006, with sales of $3.3 billion. Sales have plummeted since publication of evidence linking Avandia with increased risk of heart attack and failure.

November 29th, 2007 by Staff with NewsInferno.com

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia heart attack controversy results in black box warning

The Association announced on Tuesday that it was updating its “consensus statement” on the use of oral diabetes medications in light of the increased heart attack risks linked to some diabetes medicines, such as Avandia.

Avandia’s heart attack link came to light in May, when an analysis of 42 clinical trails published by the Cleveland Clinic showed that patients taking the drug had a 43% higher risk of having a heart attack. Earlier this month, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) announced the addition of a long-awaited black box warning for Avandia’s increased risk of heart attacks.

However, many patient advocates and FDA critics thought the black box warning was a weak response to Avandia’s safety issues, and have called on both GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Avandia, and the FDA to pull the drug from the market.

The American Diabetes Association’s revised consensus statement was formulated in cooperation with European Association for the Study of Diabetes. The statement reads in part: “New information suggests additional hazards associated with the use of either thiazolidedione, and rosiglitazone (Avandia) in particular may result in an increased frequency of myocardial infarctions. . .

We therefore recommend greater caution in using thiazolidediones, especially in patients at risk of, or with, congestive heart failure.”

The American Diabetes Association’s new Avandia stance is only the latest development that could hurt the drug’s sagging sales. In October, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced that it was dropping Avandia from its prescription drug formulary. In a statement announcing the move, the VA said that it had conducted its own review and concluded that, for some patients, Avandia did not afford the same margin of safety as other diabetes medications.

Prior to its announcement, the VA accounted for about 8% of Avandia’s sales in the United States. And in November, Health Canada sent a letter to Canadian health professionals informing them that Avandia could no longer be prescribed as monotherapy for type 2 diabetes, except when metformin use is contraindicated or not tolerated. Health Canada also withdrew its approval for Avandia to be used in combination with a sulfonylurea, except when metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated.

Last week, Glaxo got more bad news on the Avandia front when a Congressional Committee Report found that company executives made a concerted effort to intimidate Dr. John Buse, a diabetes expert, into keeping quiet about some of the Avandia’s safety problems. The report alleged that Glaxo Chief Executive Jean-Pierre Garnier and former research chief Tachi Yamada were involved in the intimidation.

November 27th, 2007

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia side effects prompt new caution from American Diabetes Association

Methods We conducted searches of the published literature, the Web site of the Food and Drug Administration, and a clinical-trials registry maintained by the drug manufacturer (GlaxoSmithKline). Criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis included a study duration of more than 24 weeks, the use of a randomized control group not receiving rosiglitazone, and the availability of outcome data for myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. Of 116 potentially relevant studies, 42 trials met the inclusion criteria. We tabulated all occurrences of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.

Results Data were combined by means of a fixed-effects model. In the 42 trials, the mean age of the subjects was approximately 56 years, and the mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level was approximately 8.2%. In the rosiglitazone group, as compared with the control group, the odds ratio for myocardial infarction was 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.98; P=0.03), and the odds ratio for death from cardiovascular causes was 1.64 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.74; P=0.06).

Conclusions Rosiglitazone was associated with a significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction and with an increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes that had borderline significance. Our study was limited by a lack of access to original source data, which would have enabled time-to-event analysis. Despite these limitations, patients and providers should consider the potential for serious adverse cardiovascular effects of treatment with rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes.

June 14th, 2007 by Steven E. Nissen, M.D., and Kathy Wolski, M.P.H. with The New England Journal of Medicine

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › Avandia on the risk of heart attack and death from cardiovascular causes

In a floor statement placed in the Senate record, Sen. Charles Grassley also said that safety watchdogs within the federal Food and Drug Administration “several months ago” recommended a “black box” on the drug’s label, the strongest possible warning.It is the first confirmation that the FDA’s own analysis of Avandia shows a similar magnitude of heart attack risks, dangers that were first publicly raised in a medical journal report published earlier this week.

Grassley complained that FDA higher-ups have said they want to wait for results of an ongoing study that will not be available for two more years before making a decision.

“That’s a long time from now when you have millions of Americans taking this drug,” said the statement by the Iowa Republican. “Those numbers seem like a high enough threshold to me for the FDA to warn the American people of the possibility of a problem.”

The FDA has been under fire since Monday’s report came out, attacked by consumer advocates for dropping the ball on drug safety and for taking no stronger action in light of the new warning signs.

Avandia, sold by the British company GlaxoSmithKline PLC, is a blockbuster medication used to treat Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease. More than 6 million people worldwide have taken the drug, whose U.S. sales topped $2.2 billion last year.

On Monday, an analysis led by Cleveland Clinic cardiology chief Dr. Steven Nissen of 42 separate studies on Avandia concluded that it raised the risk of heart attacks by 43 percent, compared to the rates among people taking no or other diabetes drugs. The analysis also indicated that Avandia might increase the risk of heart-related deaths.

GlaxoSmithKline strongly disputes the conclusions. Company officials said that while their own similar analysis suggested a 31 percent greater risk _ information it shared with the FDA as early as 2005 _ more rigorous, albeit smaller, individual studies did not show that.

Critics have accused the FDA of being lax in monitoring drug safety, and some members of Congress scheduled hearings and have subpoenaed key people to appear.

Grassley’s staff has been meeting with FDA staffers and others and gathering documents all week to investigate the issue, said Jill Kozeny, press officer for the Senate Finance Committee, of which Grassley is ranking member.

FDA spokeswoman Julie Zawisza confirmed Thursday the internal analysis that Grassley’s statement revealed, but added, “we have conflicting data” from individual studies, and therefore “are continuing to review the results of GSK’s ongoing trial to determine the actual risk.”

She said she could not discuss “ongoing regulatory matters” like the black box warning that Grassley’s statement says was urged months ago by the FDA’s Division of Drug Risk Evaluation.

As for the number of heart attacks possibly linked to the drug _ as many as 20 a day, Grassley contends _ Zawisza said: “A relationship between the drug and these deaths has not been established. We don’t have data to support such a conclusion.”

Any increase in heart attack risk is especially worrisome for diabetics because two-thirds of them die of heart problems.

About 1 million Americans are currently taking Avandia, which costs from $90 to $170 for a one-month supply. The FDA and diabetes experts are advising users of the medication to talk to their doctors and not to immediately discontinue the drug, which helps keep blood-sugar levels under control.

May 24th, 2007 by Marilynn Marchione with The Associated Press

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › FDA study said to show Avandia risk

Posted 05/21/2007 FDA informed healthcare professionals of a potential safety issue related to Avandia (rosiglitazone). An on-going analysis of safety data for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus using Avandia showed differing rates of ischemic cardiovascular events including heart attack or heart-related adverse events, some fatal, relative to other drugs used to treat diabetes mellitus. The clinical studies reviewed to date vary with respect to their populations, treatment regimens, and length of follow-up. Based on these data, the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events due to Avandia remain unclear. Prescribers should continue to carefully make individualized treatment decisions for patients with diabetes mellitus.

May 21st, 2007 by Staff with FDA

SOURCE: Avandia Recall › MedWatch 2007 Avandia