News Tagged ‘treatment of type 2 diabetes

Avandia now linked to Osteoporosis

, the manufacturer of Avandia, has already admitted that does contribute to bone fractures in women. However, the latest research goes further in understanding the issue, just what is happening to those brittle bones, and what it is that’s making them brittle in the first place.

Read the rest of this entry »

Avandia heart attack controversy results in black box warning

Avandia, a drug used in the treatment of type 2 , has been at the center of controversy since being linked to an increased risk of last May. An update to the black box warning-today’s strongest drug warning-is now being added to the label.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration () advised that , ’s maker, agreed to add the new warning to the existing black box warning. But, despite the revision, the will not withdraw from the market, claiming that evidence for increased is inconclusive and does not appear to be higher in than other type 2 treatments. In the meantime, the asked to conduct a long-term study comparing with other type 2 drugs. The trial will likely commence in a year; however, full results will not be available until 2014. Patient advocates and critics consider the black box warning a weak response to ’s safety issues and have requested be pulled from the market.

breaks down the body’s resistance to insulin but has long been known to cause fluid retention, a major risk factor for congestive heart failure. Evidence does not indicate and other oral anti- drugs-thiazolidinediones-prevent cardiovascular risk as a result of reducing blood sugar.

The American Association and the European Association for the Study of released a revised consensus statement stating that emerging information suggests additional hazards associated with thiazolidedione and rosiglitazone () and may result in increased risk of myocardial infarctions. In October, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced it was dropping from its prescription drug formulary stating their review concluded that, in some, did not afford the same margin of safety as other medications. The VA accounted for nearly 10-percent of ’s US sales.

In November, Health Canada sent a letter to Canadian health professionals advising could no longer be prescribed as monotherapy for type 2 or in combination with sulfonylurea. In May, research based on 42 studies confirmed a 43-percent increased risk of among patients taking the drug. In August, ’s warning label was changed to warn that and others in its class might worsen heart failure.

A Congressional Committee Report found that company executives made a concerted effort to intimidate a expert into keeping quiet about ’s safety problems, alleging that Glaxo Chief Executive Jean-Pierre Garnier and former research chief Tachi Yamada were involved. An internal government memo dated July 16, 2002 analyzed 47 early reports of patients who went into heart failure and required hospitalization while taking . The report contained warnings from Federal investigators that might cause heart failure.

Over six million Americans have used the drug to treat adult-onset, or type 2, and the concern about is nothing new. The association between and increased heart failure risk has been known since 1999 when the drug was first approved.

was Glaxo’s second most popular drug in 2006, with sales of $3.3 billion. Sales have plummeted since publication of evidence linking with increased risk of and failure.

November 29th, 2007 by Staff with NewsInferno.com

MedWatch 2007 Avandia

Avandia (rosiglitazone)
Audience: Endocrinologists, other healthcare professionals, consumers

Posted 05/21/2007 informed healthcare professionals of a potential safety issue related to (rosiglitazone). An on-going analysis of safety data for the treatment of type 2 mellitus using showed differing rates of ischemic cardiovascular events including or heart-related adverse events, some fatal, relative to other drugs used to treat mellitus. The clinical studies reviewed to date vary with respect to their populations, treatment regimens, and length of follow-up. Based on these data, the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events due to remain unclear. Prescribers should continue to carefully make individualized treatment decisions for patients with mellitus.

May 21st, 2007 by Staff with