News Tagged ‘diabetes

New Avandia study reaffirms heart risk

Older patients who took Avandia had a higher risk of heart attacks, congestive heart failure and death than those on other diabetes pills, according to a study of nearly 160,000 Canadians out Wednesday.

Read the rest of this entry »

Diabetes drug Avandia could weaken bones

Avandia, a drug used by millions of diabetes patients, may contribute to bone loss, according to a new study conducted in mice.

Read the rest of this entry »

Two U.S. healthcare providers drop Glaxo’s Avandia

Two U.S. pharmacy benefit managers said on Thursday they had dropped Plc’s (.L: Quote, Profile, Research) Avandia from their national formularies due to safety concerns.

Read the rest of this entry »

Avandia now linked to Osteoporosis

, the manufacturer of Avandia, has already admitted that does contribute to bone fractures in women. However, the latest research goes further in understanding the issue, just what is happening to those brittle bones, and what it is that’s making them brittle in the first place.

Read the rest of this entry »

Diabetes drug may increase bone thinning

The popular marketed as Avandia may increase bone thinning, a discovery that could help explain why diabetics can have an increased risk of fractures.

Read the rest of this entry »

Avandia heart attack controversy results in black box warning

Avandia, a drug used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, has been at the center of controversy since being linked to an increased risk of heart attack last May. An update to the black box warning-today’s strongest drug warning-is now being added to the label.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advised that , ’s maker, agreed to add the new warning to the existing black box warning. But, despite the revision, the FDA will not withdraw from the market, claiming that evidence for increased heart attack is inconclusive and does not appear to be higher in than other type 2 diabetes treatments. In the meantime, the FDA asked to conduct a long-term study comparing with other type 2 diabetes drugs. The trial will likely commence in a year; however, full results will not be available until 2014. Patient advocates and FDA critics consider the black box warning a weak response to ’s safety issues and have requested be pulled from the market.

breaks down the body’s resistance to insulin but has long been known to cause fluid retention, a major risk factor for congestive heart failure. Evidence does not indicate and other oral anti-diabetes drugs-thiazolidinediones-prevent cardiovascular risk as a result of reducing blood sugar.

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes released a revised consensus statement stating that emerging information suggests additional hazards associated with thiazolidedione and rosiglitazone () and may result in increased risk of myocardial infarctions. In October, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced it was dropping from its prescription drug formulary stating their review concluded that, in some, did not afford the same margin of safety as other diabetes medications. The VA accounted for nearly 10-percent of ’s US sales.

In November, Health Canada sent a letter to Canadian health professionals advising could no longer be prescribed as monotherapy for type 2 diabetes or in combination with sulfonylurea. In May, research based on 42 studies confirmed a 43-percent increased risk of heart attack among patients taking the drug. In August, ’s warning label was changed to warn that and others in its class might worsen heart failure.

A Congressional Committee Report found that company executives made a concerted effort to intimidate a diabetes expert into keeping quiet about ’s safety problems, alleging that Glaxo Chief Executive Jean-Pierre Garnier and former research chief Tachi Yamada were involved. An internal government memo dated July 16, 2002 analyzed 47 early FDA reports of patients who went into heart failure and required hospitalization while taking . The report contained warnings from Federal investigators that might cause heart failure.

Over six million Americans have used the drug to treat adult-onset, or type 2, diabetes and the concern about is nothing new. The association between and increased heart failure risk has been known since 1999 when the drug was first approved.

was Glaxo’s second most popular drug in 2006, with sales of $3.3 billion. Sales have plummeted since publication of evidence linking with increased risk of heart attack and failure.

November 29th, 2007 by Staff with NewsInferno.com

Avandia side effects prompt new caution from American Diabetes Association

Risks associated with Avandia have led the American Diabetes Association to call on doctors to use more caution when prescribing oral medications to treat people with type two diabetes.

Read the rest of this entry »

Avandia reviewer calls for changes in FDA drug approval process

The Avandia debacle has prompted a safety official from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to call for changes in the way diabetes medications are approved for use in the United States. The FDA official, who reviewed the original approval application for , told the Journal of Diabetes Care that the safety and effectiveness of experimental diabetes medications should be tested against existing drugs before they are approved. If such a testing protocol were to be adopted by the FDA, it would mark a significant departure from the way most medications are granted approval in the United States.

Read the rest of this entry »

Confusing new warning label on Avandia

If you take the popular Avandia, you should take notice at the new warning label. The FDA has strengthened the warning label on to include an increased risk for heart attack. But it may be a little confusing. Officials say the warning label will say that “may or may not” increase their risk of heart attack.

Read the rest of this entry »

Avandia on the risk of heart attack and death from cardiovascular causes

Background Rosiglitazone is widely used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has not been determined.

Read the rest of this entry »